Young Population Attending for Whole Body Technetium 99MDP Bone Scintigraphy: A Single Institution Experience
Objective: Radionuclide isotope scanning is a sensitive scanning procedure for the detecting of bone pathology. This article focuses on an institution experience bone Scintigraphy applications in patients below 25 years.
Patients and methods: This study is a retrospective descriptive study that analyzed the handwritten medical records of patients younger than 25 years old referred for Technetium bone scan in Mansoura University Hospital, Nuclear Medicine Unit from August 2011 to October 2015.
Results: Seventy-six patients younger than 25 years old were referred for bone scan. The main cause of referral was metastatic work up. Osteosarcomas and Ewing tumors constituted together the commonest malignant tumors referred while osteochondromas were the commonest benign tumors. The area around the knee was the commonest affected area in the primary bone neoplasm’s while the vertebrae and the pelvis were the commonest sites of distant metastasis. No recorded complications existed secondary to the injection of the radioactive material. The commonest defect was lack of documentation of the family history.
Conclusion: This study helped to elucidate the extent of medical support that our nuclear medicine unit can give to other pediatric and adolescent medical specialties. It demonstrates also the wise selection of the cases to be referred for bone scan. To maximize the benefit from our bone scan service, analysis of differences between our unit and older larger units in the country is needed as regard policy decisions and financing. Digital reporting will put an end to mistakes in handwritten patient records.
Radionuclide isotope scanning is a sensitive scanning procedure for the detecting of bone pathology. A bone scan images the metabolic activity of the skeleton. This has traditionally been accomplished by imaging a radionuclide whose physiology closely mimics a metabolic process within bone. Nuclear Scintigraphy of the bone commonly utilizes the radio-nuclides technetium-99m (Tc-99m) or fluoride-18 (F-18). Tc-99m is usually attached to Medronic acid (Tc-99m MDP) and F-18 incorporated into sodium fluoride (F-18 NaF). These molecules are injected intravenously, and a nuclear camera that contains a salt crystal captures the decay of photons from the radioisotope. This is achieved through the process of scintillation or fluorescence that occurs when the photon emitted by the radionuclide hits the salt crystal within the nuclear camera. The scintillations are then digitized and converted to images for interpretation by a nuclear medicine physician .
This article focuses on an institutional experience in planar bone Scintigraphy and its applications in young patients below 25 years.
Patients and Methods
This study is a retrospective descriptive study that analyzed the handwritten medical records of patients younger than 25 years old referred for Technetium bone scan in Mansoura University Hospital, Nuclear Medicine Unit from August 2011 to October2015. Epidemiological data, investigations done for every patient other than the bone scan, the therapeutic history and bone scan reporting were all documented. Planer skeletal scintigraphy was performed at 3 h following intravenous administration of 750 MBq of Tc 99m methylene diphosphonate (MDP) using dual detector gamma camera (Philips) No cases was examined by Single Photon Emission Tomography (SPECT) due to lack of experience in its application.
The study was approved by the institutional Ethical Committee.
Seventy-six patients younger than 25 years old were referred for bone scan in Mansoura University Hospital, Nuclear Medicine unit from August 2011 to October2015. The mean age was 16 years and the age range was (1-24 years). The majority of the patients were males. Seventy-two patients (95%) were living in rural areas (Table 1).
|< 15 years||27||35.5|
|≥ 15 years||49||64.5|
|Primary bone tumor||32||42.1|
|No defined diagnosis||20||26.3|
|Place of Residence|
All the cases were referred by a specialized physician or a consultant. The main cause of referral was metastatic work up in patients with a high suspicion or confirmed diagnosis of malignancy (Table 2).
|Exploring the whole skeleton in existence of a provisional diagnosis of a benign bone lesion||18||24%|
|Metastatic work up in existence of a primary tumor highly suspicious of malignancy or proved to be malignant||56||74%|
|Exploring the whole skeleton in existence of delayed milestones||1||1.30%|
|Unexplained generalized bone aches||1||1.30%|
It was found that the reporting of each scan was done by at least 2 consultants. On analyzing the reporting, agreement between the consultants as regard diagnosis was found and no consultation of a higher specialized center was needed.
Osteosarcomas and Ewing tumors constituted together the commonest of the malignant tumors referred while osteochondromas were the commonest benign tumors (Table 3).
|No defined diagnosis||13||7|
|Round cell tumor||2||0|
|Malignant fibrous histocytosis||1||0|
|Giant cell tumor||1||2|
|Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor||0||1|
|Acute lymphatic leukemia||0||1|
|Metastasis of unknown origin||2||2|
In one osteochondroma case, the bone scan discovered extra lesions in the skeleton that were diagnosed neither clinically nor by plain X ray films. None of the osteochondroma patients had lesions that raised the suspicion of malignant transformation.
The area around the knee was the commonest affected area in the primary bone neoplasm’s (Table 4). On the other hand, the vertebrae and the pelvis were the commonest sites (97%) of distant metastasis. No case of super scan was reported. There were no cases of intestinal uptake of Tc-MDP on bone scans. No recorded complications existed secondary to the injection of the radioactive material. The different defects in the patient records are shown in table 5. The commonest defect was lack of documentation of the family history.
|Tumor type||Around Knee||Humerus||Iliac bone||Femur||Foot||Tibia||Paraspinal|
|Giant cell tumor||3||0||0||0||0||0||0|
|Defect||Number of Encountered Defects|
|Absent family history||65|
|Non direct mentioning of the cause of referral for bone scan in the request.||6|
|Non reporting of vital signs as blood pressure, pulse or non reporting of weight and height||5|
|Non detailed documentation of the symptoms at presentation||5|
|Reports of the other radiology investigations exist without images.||25|
|The final report did not stat frankly the agreement or contradiction between the bone scan and the previously done radiology||10|
|Non documentation of requiring sedation or particular narcotic analgesia during the imaging process||2|
Bone Scintigraphy is a famous method for imaging wide variations of benign or malignant skeletal abnormalities .
Although bone metastasis is uncommon among children with cancer , the main cause of referral was metastatic work up. This is attributed to the fact that skeletal- related events affects the disease future .
Coinciding with the literature , the axial skeleton was the commonest site of bone metastasis. MRI is better than skeletal scintigraphy regarding the sensitivity, specificity and clarifying of the metastasis extent . However, cost issues still prevent the total dependence on total body MRI and PET scan or both together in initial diagnosis of bone metastasis in our locality.
Going in harmony with literature [6-10], our work revealed that osteosarcoma incidence was higher in young males with more predilections to the area around the knee. On the other hand, osteochondromas were the commonest benign bone tumor with also a higher incidence in young males.
Factors as chronic osteomyelitis, bone infarction, insertion of metallic prostheses, previous exposure to ionizing irradiation and receiving alkylating agents are known predisposing factors in osteosarcoma . However, none of them seems to be a predisposing factor in our cases. This could be explained by the small number of patients.
In spite of the reported occasional existence of osteosarcomas and osteochondromas both together in the same patient , it was not reported in our cases.
Although osteochondromas could be hereditary , the hereditary stat of our osteochonroma cases was not clearly documented due to the defective family history in the patient’s files.
Referring osteochondromas for bone scan to detect precisely their number in the skeleton is a reported indication , however in only one of our cases, one extra site was diagnosed. No autism among our osteochondroma case was reported although occasionally both may exist together .
The abnormal bone geometry related to Turner Syndrome  is being further investigated in the Pediatric Department of our University Hospital. However one case has been referred to our Nuclear Medicine till the time of presenting this study.
No cases of osteomyelitis was referred, this may be due to the satisfactory increasing role of MRI in its diagnosis .
There are indications of bone scan in the literature that were not reported during this study period for example the follow up of autologous bone graft of sarcomas  and diagnosing a vascular bone necrosis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant .
Super scan in a child or an adolescent is probably due to osteomalacia . Due to better family awareness in the recent years, osteomalacia is not a common health problem and so no super scans were diagnosed.
The incidence of intestinal uptake in Tc MDP bone scan is 1%  and this may explain why it was not found in our reports.
Among the positive aspects found in this study is that the referred cases were well selected and referred in the proper time of their medical history which makes the scan procedure cost-effective? On the contrary, the absent experience in applying SPECT technology in our unit till now is a strong drawback that will be resolved in the nearest future. Digital patient records will not allow mistakes reported in the manually written records anymore and can help creating more integration between the medical departments.
In spite of being a small study, it helped to elucidate the extent of medical support that our nuclear medicine unit can give to other pediatric and adolescent specialties. It demonstrates also the wise selection of the cases to be referred for bone scan. To maximize the benefit from our bone scan service, analysis of differences between our unit and older larger units in the country is needed as regard policy decisions and financing. Digital reporting will put an end to mistakes in handwritten patient records.